Dacia Logan II MCV, the spiritual successor to the Mondeo II Estate and the B4 Passat. The ideal car for those who want to buy as much metal as possible with their money. Not necessarily quality metal, but lots of it.
The first MCV was a real success, especially among gubment fleets and people who couldn’t see the difference between potatoes from people. And it was quite capable for small or big business work, as that’s what the Logan VAN was for, basically the windowless van version of the Logan MCV, which is a cheaper Touran. A posher Modus. An almost-not-quite-there Caddy.
However, by 2013 the Dacia Logan II MCV realized that it couldn’t haul around people, potatoes and construction supplies at the same time, so it mutated and so the Logdy and Dokker were born. Lodgy remains for people who haven’t heard of vasectomy, and Dokker is the official car of real craftsmen who drink their coffee with Mountain Dew in the morning, with whiskey in the evening. A real van, for real men.
And so, who was the Dacia Logan II MCV left with? Clearly, with the engines available, it’s for the family man who wants the cheapest estate on the market. If you look at the engines, you can see that the Logan II MCV is not made for hard work but rather for small businesses that don’t carry a lot of heavy stuff or for family guys who wanted a new, cheap station wagon.
Like I said in the Logan article however, it’s mind-boggling to see how much Dacia has evolved: automatic gearbox…well, robotic manual…reverse camera, cruise control, hill assist, start/stop, synthetic leather upholstery provided by C+C Music Factory because it’s gonna make you sweat. Is this for real or is it a Fanta sea?
Petrol
Diesel
1.5 dCi 75 and 95 horsepower – You’d think it’s the same engine with various power outputs and no other differences. And you’d be more wrong than Britney Spears when she complained that “Ops! I’ve done it again!“. The main difference is that the 95 horsepower engine also has an AdBlue system, and the 75 makes due without one since it pollutes less. And so the 75 bhp version is much more reliable, but on the downside you’ll get pedestrians knocking on your window telling you to go faster. The 90 bhp version is marginally more muscular, but at what cost? If you don’t know what the deal with AdBlue is, let me put it this way – AdBlue is in 2020 to the diesel cars what the DPF was in 2010 to the diesel cars.
Europe is full of these. They are excellent city cars, cheap and reliable. It’s good that Dacia have realized this and separated the cars so you know exactly what you’re buying. You don’t know what a vasectomy is and you can’t help yourself, you’ve got the Lodgy. If you’re a entrepreneur that is just starting, you’ve got the Dokker. If you’re a family man and to you the car is just another appliance, you’ve got the Logan MCV. On the other hand, I have to admit that the Dacia Logan II MCV Stepway looks great in style. If they were to give it a 4×4 system, nobody would’ve have bought the Duster. Or any other car.
What engines do you recommend? For petrol, I recommend the excellent 0.9 TCe, even if it’s abit small for this body. As for the diesel, I really have a hard time choosing between the 75 and 95 horsepower 1.5 dCi unit.
Similar Articles