I recently listened to Blu Cantrell – Breathe and the lyrics go “All we do is make up and break up” and I immediately thought of the Range Rover P38. Range Rover P38, a car worthy of being a guest on Love Island.
Let me give you a short intro and tell you why the Range Rover P38 was betrayed and why it was a rebellious child worthy of “Outnumbered”, I must tell you that the Range Rover P38 appeared in 1994. You know what else happened in 1994? Land Rover was bought by BMW and the P38 was the first victim to use BMW parts, having both Rover and BMW sourced engines.
I was talking about Ford and about the thefts in the car industry, how they bought Mazda and Volvo and “borrowed” their technology, then these companies were left like at the dentist – in pain and with their money taken. And BMW pulled exactly the same move with Land Rover.
By 1997 the Mercedes ML appeared to steal the show, the first large-sized SUV (medium sized in the US) capable of driving on the road. Sort of. In other words, the first status symbol SUV. The original Chelsea tractor. It’s just that the ML had already announced all the way back in 1991 that it would enter the development stage together with those from Mitsubishi, and BMW said it wants a piece of this cake because it is potential and they saw an opportunity in the deceased Land Rover. Under the umbrella of the famous British Leyland, the car factories in our England were full of model employees, constantly drunk and with a work ethic worthy of Pre-Malone and with skills just as impeccable. This meant that the Daihatsu Cuore was a Rolls Royce compared to what was coming out of the doors of British Leyland, a fact for which they went bankrupt in 1988 and the brands were separated. Rover was going to be bought by BMW in 1994 and this is how they found their 4×4 technology with which to answer to the Mercedes ML, without wasting time with the development from scratch.
The problem was that you would believe that Rover was saved by BMW, and you would be wrong. BMW were actually interested in the technology from the Range Rover to launch their very own X5, the ultimate Chelsea tractor that would explode this car segment. And this was further reinforced by the X5 receiving the best available engines from BMW at the time and the Range Rover P38 stuck with the old engines from the Discovery and received only a microscopic 2.5 diesel from BMW. Instead it donated the 4×4 technology and about 25 years of history so that in 2001 it could be sold on to Ford.
Petrol
Diesel
2.5 tds M51 of 136 horsepower – The antique M51 that was fitted to BMW 3 Series E36, 5 Series E34, 7 Series E38, 5 Series E39 and Opel Omega. In other words, you can find replacement parts literally everywhere. The only real weak point is the turbo, otherwise this engine can go for billions of km. On the other hand, it is quite limited to off-roading because the performance on the tarmac are modest to be generous. With a 0-100 time of 15.8 seconds for the automatic version and 14.3 for the manual version, you stand no chance against the 1.4 MPI entry-level Dacia Logan which had a 0-100 of 13 seconds. Apart from the 2.0 SDI naturally aspirated diesel Caddy which has a 0-100 time of 20.5 seconds, I don’t know what else you could overtake.
A car with more problems than Jay-Z. However, if you go for the coilover suspension + BMW 2.5 diesel engine + automatic transmission combo you have one of the most reliable Range Rovers of recent times. And this is especially true in the mountainous area where it is full of P38 Range Rovers . A car built only to have its technology stolen and to give birth to the dubious BMW X5 E53 and at the same time being one of the most capable mountain cars that you can buy with not so much money.
Which engines do I recommend? For petrol you can for both of them as they are pretty much the same engine, but if you want to keep the running costs decent.
Similar Articles