Land Rover Freelander L359, a car that started badly but finished well. If the Land Rover Freelander L359 were a series, it would be “The Office”.
Launched in 2006 after the Land Rover marketing department conducted a survey in between two pints, the Land Rover Freelander L359 wanted to be the Range Rover for the budget conscious, the compact entry-level baby Range Rover that more people could afford and which is not as intimidating size-wise because that is a problem for some potential buyers. They initially tried it with the first generation Freelander, but that car has too much off-road credit and too little on-road ability. Then came the Range Rover Evoque in 2011, which is too much on-road and too little off-road capable.
Weeelll you could’ve bought a Land Rover Freelander L359 with all-wheel drive, front and rear differentials, automatic transmission and a sturdy diesel engine. Or you could’ve also bought a basic front-wheel drive, manual transmission, petrol Freelander. Or an all-wheel drive, manual transmission, petrol Freelander.
And so the Freelander L359 has always been in a personality crisis, akin to an aspiring corporate worker who realized that his place in the company is no longer that important and that if he left tomorrow, someone else would warm his seat in within two days. It wasn’t an off-roader like the Range Rover, it wasn’t even as good-looking as the Evoque that followed.
But 2011 came and brought the Land Rover Freelander L359 a Katie Price grade facelift that solved most of the reliability concerns and that’s how it became perhaps the only modern Land Rover that is not dieing right from the factory gates. Usually when you drive a Land Rover you know that it can die at any moment, the only question is “when?”. But not in a Freelander L359 or a Discovery. However, the Freelander L359 already had a poor track record of reliability and was retired in 2014 by Discovery Sport. But the 2011 – 2014 facelift models are really the ones to go for.
Petrol
Diesel
2.2d Ford Duratorq PSA DW12 of 150, 160 and 190 horsepower – The famous 2.2 Duratorq from Ford (which is actually borrowed from PSA) came under the guises of eD4 (150 horsepower version), TD4 (160 horsepower version) and SD4 (190 horsepower version). Until 2011 they suffered from premature camshaft wear if low quality oil and/or low quality fuel was used. With the 2011 facelift a new and improved camshaft was used but it is still recommended to use quality 5W-30 engine oil as well as a quality diesel. Don’t be picky about diesel, you’re driving a Land Rover. Another special mention goes to the 190 horsepower version that has a bigger turbo hence the extra grunt, but the pipe connecting the turbo to the intercooler has not been changed to accomodate the larger turbo. The turbo spins, the temperature rises, the pipe expands and disconnects. The turbo is no longer connected to the intercooler, it stops working and sends the car into Limp Mode. And that’s how you’ll drag yourself home at 10 mph and reflect on the fact that you have a Land Rover.
Land Rover Freelander L359 was not a bad car. On the other hand, unlike many cross-over abominations from it’s day the Freelander is actually off-road capable and comes with the necessary equipment to tackle the Ben Nevis. It’s just that reliability issues from the previous generation and right up until the 2011 facelift made the car fade into obscurity and the eventual cancel from the Land Rover portfolio. That’s why they didn’t release the Land Rover Freelander III and came up with the Discovery Sport, because another Freelander wouldn’t have sold very well, especially since the 2nd generation Freelander wasn’t the best-selling car possible in the first place. It would have been as if Nigel Farage running for elections again.
Which engine do I recommend? Honestly for the Freelander the 2.2 Duratorq 160 horsepower diesel makes the most sense, mated to a manual gearbox. Wether you want all-wheel drive or not, that’s up to you. Yes, the car must be a post-2011 facelift model.
Similar Articles