You might think that a Citroen C3 AirCross is just a C3 with extra plastic and you can go home on this bombshell, but things spiral out of control faster than fights in the old town.
Perhaps the regular C3 didn’t catch on much in Europe because it’s too expensive for what it offers, but the C3 AirCross seems to enjoy a mini success because it’s a cheap crossover that looks better than a Duster, even when both are in the base trim level. And speaking of the Duster, the main rival of the Citroen C3 AirCross, at the time of writing this article, the Citroen C3 AirCross starts at 17,700 pounds, 200 pounds cheaper than the Duster, and the only cars cheaper, which I wouldn’t necessarily call crossovers, are the Suzuki Ignis starting at 15,500 pounds and the Kia Stonic starting at 16,800 pounds.
That’s a very good question to which I don’t know if I have a mega relevant answer or even a semi-relevant one. Okay, let’s remove the Suzuki Ignis from the list because it’s the cheapest and most utilitarian car on the list. If you want a pseudo-crossover and don’t care much about features or quality, the Suzuki Ignis beats the whole market. And the Ignis also gets the hybrid bonus, and you can get a new Ignis for about 11,500 euros, so there’s really no point in discussing it.
Moving on to the next round, and we quickly understand that the main rival of the C3 AirCross is not the Duster but the Kia Stonic. Both have 84 horsepower, both have millions of customization options ( the C3 AirCross has billions of options ), both are slightly taller superminis ( the Kia Rio for the Stonic and the C3 for the C3 AirCross), both have roughly the same dimensions, with the Citroen C3 AirCross having an additional 12 cm in height and 2 cm in length, practically a whole Kenny Baker in difference. And the Citroen C3 AirCross remains, like the rest of the family, the most stylish in its class. But is that style enough to grab your eye and your money?
Petrol
Diesel
Like the regular C3 version, the Citroen C3 AirCross didn’t do too well here in Europe, and you could argue that the price says enough or maybe everything. In other words, the Crossland platform sibling does slightly better in terms of sales, but not by much, and the value-for-money ratio may not be the best. My opinion and verdict are that a Citroen C3 does exactly the same job as a C3 AirCross and may look the same or even better, and is definitely much more economical.
Which engines do I recommend? For petrol power the entry level 1.0 PureTech and it’s 83 horsepower should do the job, and for diesel just go for the tried and tested 1.6 HDi and it’s 99 horsepower of pure baguette muscle. Or maybe just baguette, as the engine might aswell be made out of baguettes.
Similar Articles