Mazda 3 BL or how to ruin an absolutely decent car because that's what management decided. Mazda 3 BL, that car that could have been, but gave up along the way. If it's worth your money or not, find out in today's review.
Mazda 3 BL came to replace a rather strange car for it's time. It was a pure Japanese car, with the full fun package, such as semi-independent suspension, chain-driven punchy petrol engines, which only worked when revved hard. A fun car, driven by the hoonigans who wanted something more than the boring Golf or the old Astra. They weren't even interested in the Ford Focus, because they read somewhere that 80% of Fords are still on the roads, and the remaining 20% have arrived at home. And Ford corporate caught ear of this and decided to punish said hoonigans.
Simple, Ford executives barged into Mazda and Volvo offices and threw a bunch of money-ladden suitcases at them. Volvo had invested quite a lot in their own R&D and had little money for anything else, and Mazda was always a weak company in the marketing department in Europe and that's why it was not as popular in Europe. And so Ford stol..."borrowed"...all the technology and especially petrol engines from Mazda and let them make do with what was left in the dumpsters behind the factory.
Things however turned to better in 2008 when Mazda becomes independent again by buying back Ford's stock participation, but in the same year the Mazda 3 BL is launched, which was essentially a Ford Focus II with a more aggressive appearance. An idea as good as when you drink beer, eat some watermelons and start doing jumping jacks.
Why did they launch in 2008 a model designed together with Ford when they could have postponed the launch by 1-2 years and modified the model so that it would not be another commercial failure? Because Mazda. It's like asking why do feet smell, if they have no nose? Or if penguins have knees?
Petrol
Diesel
If you go on the internet and read anything other than the theories of Alex Johnes, a complete and correctly defined esoteric fighter from an esoteric point of view through the ranks and distinctions awarded, you will read horror stories about the rust on Mazda 3, especially Mazda 3 BK and Mazda 3 BL. True thing in countries with a humid climate, such as England. There yes, the Mazda 3 rusts before being assembled. But in civilized Europe you don't have to worry about this kind of thing. Mind you however that the Mazda 3 BL is prone to rust, so if you live in a humid place or someplace with lots of snow, then make sure to rustproof your Mazda.
An extraordinary car, which could have been. Except that the problem with the Mazda 3 BL is as follows: You have a 2.0 petrol which is too big and too thirsty for the average driver, you have a 1.6 petrol which is too slow for the typical Mazda driver and you have a 1.6 diesel which is just as as good as geting a lap dance from Preston Lacy. Maybe the rest of the car is reliable and fun, but the only engine you can realistically buy in Europe is the 105 horsepower 1.6 petrol engine, and thus the Mazda 3 BL becomes just another compact of the dozen, somewhere in a dealership's brochure. However, if you stick with a 2.0 petrol, you will make the Mazda 3 BL an old-fashioned pure-blooded Japanese. Trust me, it's worth it. Even better, if you live in a country where fun is not punished, then you got the 2.0, the 2.3 and the 2.5 to get your kicks and the Mazda 3 BL is worth every single penny it demands from time to time.
What engine do I recommend? Obviously I will talk about that 150 horsepower 2.0 MZR and obviously you will buy the 105 horsepower 1.6 MZR petrol. The diesel options are just...no.
Similar Articles
Hello, between the BL and BK generation MPS, which one would you recommend? From what I've seen, the only differences are in the interior and exterior appearance and the presence of RECARO seats on the BK, are there any other changes under the hood?
Very useful explanations. I have had a Mazda 3 II BL 1.6 CD (115 hp diesel) for some time now and it doesn't really show any signs of fatigue, and on the highway at 140-145 it takes 5.5. In my opinion, it's an honorable car. Thanks for the tip about the turbo filter, I'll ask the mechanic to check it. Cheers.
Hello, what do you think about the 2.0 DISI petrol with 151 horsepower?
Hi, I want to buy a car and my budget is maximum 4000 euros. What do you think about the Mazda 3 2010, 1.6, 150 hp, petrol or the Kia Ceed 1.4, 109 hp, petrol. Maybe if you have any other recommendations. Thanks for the answer :)